Honest assessment first
The initial review is free and its purpose is to establish whether a case is worth pursuing. Often the answer is no, and we say so before anyone commits money.
We investigate cryptocurrency and investment fraud. We do not sell hope, and we do not guarantee outcomes we cannot control.
Almost everyone who contacts us has already been approached by someone promising to get their money back for an up-front fee. Victim lists are traded between criminal groups, and second-stage fraud is now one of the most reliable revenue streams in this sector.
That is the environment we operate in, and it shapes how we work. We do not make unsolicited contact. We do not guarantee recovery. We tell clients early when a case has no realistic path, because continuing to bill work that cannot succeed is exactly what the firms we are trying to be distinguished from do.
What we offer instead is competent investigative work, a clear account of what it can and cannot achieve, and documentation that stands up when it reaches an exchange's compliance desk or a law enforcement file.
If anyone claiming to represent us does any of the above, it is not us. Contact us through the details on this site and report it.
The initial review is free and its purpose is to establish whether a case is worth pursuing. Often the answer is no, and we say so before anyone commits money.
Every conclusion we reach is traceable to on-chain data, documents or open-source material. If we are inferring rather than proving, we label it as inference.
Recovery happens when a regulated intermediary freezes funds or a court compels their return. We build cases those parties will act on.
Case data sits on encrypted infrastructure, evidence files are stored outside the public web directory, and access is limited to the assigned team.
Industrial fraud is engineered by organised teams using tested psychological methods. Being deceived is not carelessness, and we do not treat it as such.
We are not law enforcement, not a law firm and not financial advisers. Where you need one of those, we say so and help you get there.
Figures drawn from our case management system.
A single case routinely spans several jurisdictions: the victim in one country, an exchange in a second, a cash-out in a third. Our work is to reconstruct that route precisely enough that each party along it can be approached through the right legal channel, in the right order, while the funds are still reachable.
Where a route ends at a mixer, a privacy coin, or a jurisdiction that will not cooperate, that is the finding — and we report it rather than continuing to bill.
Nobody can — that is a property of how blockchains work, not a limitation of our tooling. Recovery happens through intermediaries who hold the funds, not through the chain itself.
We can produce evidence that gives a compliance team defensible grounds to act, and support the legal process that follows. Whether they act is their decision.
These break the analytical trail by design. Where that has happened we will tell you plainly rather than charging for work with no realistic endpoint.
Cases reported within days have materially better prospects than cases reported after months. Older cases are not automatically hopeless, but they are harder, and we will be direct about the difference.
Submit your case and we will tell you what is realistically achievable — before you commit to anything.
No obligation. We never ask for seed phrases, private keys, or remote access.